Label transparencyThe best label this desk has read. Every active itemised, extract ratios printed for both concentrated ingredients with dry-powder equivalents, a full Other Ingredients line, a revision date, and the distributor's own name, address and phone on the artwork. It loses a mark for standardisation, and for the 5% boron figure that most readers will misread.4/5
Ingredient evidenceTwo of the seven have no monograph anywhere we looked. Saw palmetto's own evidence is negative for the use it is best known for. Nettle's is the most promising and the label names the wrong plant part. This is a 2 rather than a 1 because the amounts are real and two ingredients do have citable files.2/5
Claim accuracyThe strongest claims in the series, resting on the weakest evidence in it. “Increase Libido and Sexual Desire” is asserted over a panel where the two ingredients traditionally used for that have no monograph between them.1/5
Buying termsA published 60-day money-back window from purchase — the first in this series. The return procedure, address and refund timing were all supplied. It is not a 5 only because no price list reached this desk.4/5
Safety informationThe caution block is present and correctly worded, and the Other Ingredients line means allergen and gelatin questions can be answered. Nothing on the bottle mentions the nettle or epimedium interactions, and nothing mentions the category's hidden-drug problem.2/5
Seller transparencyA named distributor with a street address and phone on the label itself, a separate order desk, an office and returns address, and a site email with stated hours. Marked down because the pack supplied fabricated clinicians, fabricated customers and two government logos.4/5